Daniela Hantuchova vs Meghann ShaughnessyStanford Round of 16

Stanford · WTA · Round of 16
43 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 25 July 2005
hard
47 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Hantuchova D.
6-4 3-6 6-1
Shaughnessy M.
Hantuchova D.
6362
Shaughnessy M.
4611

Daniela Hantuchova defeated Meghann Shaughnessy 6-4 3-6 6-1 in the Stanford round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniela Hantuchova came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Daniela Hantuchova extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniela Hantuchova came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

41
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-08-31US OpenR128hardDaniela Hantuchova6-2 4-6 6-1
2007-06-18's-HertogenboschR16grassDaniela Hantuchova3-6 6-3 5-3 RET
2005-10-03FilderstadtR32hardDaniela Hantuchova6-4 6-0
2002-01-06SydneyR16hardMeghann Shaughnessy6-4 6-1
2001-10-15ZurichR32hardDaniela Hantuchova6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Hantuchova D.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Shaughnessy M.

Shaughnessy M.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hantuchova D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
36
Break points saved·Even
68
69
Break points won·Clear edge
67
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
45
Tiebreaks·
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast