Amelie Mauresmo vs Venus WilliamsAntwerp Final

Antwerp · WTA · Final
47 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 February 2005
hard
1654ELO
1617Hard ELO
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Mauresmo A.
4-6 7-5 6-4
Williams V.
Mauresmo A.
4762
Williams V.
6541

Amelie Mauresmo defeated Venus Williams 4-6 7-5 6-4 in the Antwerp final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, but Amelie Mauresmo had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 7 on hard. Amelie Mauresmo narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

25
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2004-11-01PhiladelphiaQFcarpetAmelie Mauresmo7-5 5-7 6-1
2003-04-28WarsawFclayAmelie Mauresmo6-7(6) 6-0 3-0 RET
2002-08-26US OpenSFhardVenus Williams6-3 5-7 6-4
2002-02-11AntwerpSFhardVenus Williams7-6(4) 6-0
2002-02-05ParisSFcarpetVenus Williams4-6 7-6(3) 7-5
2001-01-15Australian OpenR16hardVenus Williams6-2 3-6 6-3
1998-01-19Australian OpenR32hardVenus Williams6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mauresmo A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Williams V.

Williams V.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mauresmo A.

Serve advantage — Mauresmo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
44%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
4.7
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
68
54
Break points saved·Even
82
83
Break points won·Slight edge
75
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
30
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
65
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast