Serena Williams vs Elena Dementieva — WTA Tour Championships Round Robin
WTA Tour Championships · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 10 November 2004 ·
carpet
Williams S.7-6 7-5
Dementieva E.
Williams S.
772
Dementieva E.
650
Serena Williams defeated Elena Dementieva 7-6 7-5 in the WTA Tour Championships round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Serena Williams came in leading the head-to-head 6–5. Serena Williams extended the head-to-head to 7–5.
Key context
- Match story: Serena Williams edged Elena Dementieva in two tight sets (7–6 7–5).
Head to head
6–5| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-01-11 | Sydney | F | hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2009-10-26 | WTA Tour Championships | RR | carpet | Serena Williams | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2009-08-17 | Toronto | SF | hard | Elena Dementieva | 7-6 6-1 |
| 2009-06-22 | Wimbledon | SF | grass | Serena Williams | 6-7 7-5 8-6 |
| 2009-01-19 | Australian Open | SF | hard | Serena Williams | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2009-01-12 | Sydney | SF | hard | Elena Dementieva | 6-3 6-1 |
| 2008-08-11 | Olympics | QF | hard | Elena Dementieva | 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
| 2007-10-08 | Moscow | F | hard | Elena Dementieva | 5-7 6-1 6-1 |
| 2004-07-19 | Los Angeles | SF | hard | Serena Williams | 6-3 7-6 |
| 2004-03-24 | Miami | F | hard | Serena Williams | 6-1 6-1 |
| 2003-06-23 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Serena Williams | 6-2 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
49%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
5.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
99
81
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
65
Break points won·Even
99
95
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
68
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About