Patty Schnyder defeated Daniela Hantuchova 6-4 4-6 7-6 in the US Open round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Daniela Hantuchova came in leading the head-to-head 10–8, defending last year's round of 32, but Patty Schnyder had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 5 on hard. Patty Schnyder narrowed the head-to-head to 10–9.
| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-10-11 | Linz | QF | hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2010-03-22 | Miami | R64 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2007-10-22 | Linz | F | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2007-09-24 | Luxembourg | QF | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 5-7 7-5 |
| 2006-10-16 | Zurich | R32 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 7-5 |
| 2006-01-09 | Sydney | R16 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
| 2005-10-24 | Linz | QF | hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2005-10-03 | Filderstadt | R16 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2005-08-22 | New Haven | R16 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 5-7 6-2 6-4 |
| 2004-08-15 | Olympics | R32 | hard | Patty Schnyder | 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
| 2004-05-03 | Berlin | R64 | grass | Patty Schnyder | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2003-09-22 | Leipzig | R16 | carpet | Patty Schnyder | 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) |
| 2003-01-13 | Australian Open | R16 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2002-10-14 | Zurich | QF | hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5) |
| 2002-08-19 | New Haven | QF | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2002-08-12 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 7-6(3) |
| 2002-04-27 | Fed Cup WG R1: SVK vs SUI | RR | clay | Patty Schnyder | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | R32 | hard | Patty Schnyder | 6-3 1-6 7-5 |
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About