Andy Roddick vs Jonas BjorkmanDavis Cup WG QF: USA vs SWE Round Robin

Davis Cup WG QF: USA vs SWE · ATP · Round Robin
43 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Friday, 9 April 2004
hard
54 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLL
Roddick A.
7-6 6-4 6-0
Bjorkman J.
Roddick A.
77663
Bjorkman J.
6340

Andy Roddick defeated Jonas Bjorkman 7-6 6-4 6-0 in the Davis Cup WG QF: USA vs SWE round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Andy Roddick extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2007-09-21Davis Cup WG SF: SWE vs USARRcarpetAndy Roddick6-2 7-6(3) 6-4
2004-03-22Miami MastersR32hardAndy Roddick6-4 3-6 6-3
2004-01-05DohaR16hardJonas Bjorkman6-3 6-4
2003-10-27Paris MastersQFhardAndy Roddick7-5 7-6(0)
2003-06-23WimbledonQFgrassAndy Roddick6-4 6-2 6-4
2002-06-17NottinghamR32grassJonas Bjorkman7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Roddick A.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Bjorkman J.

Bjorkman J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Roddick A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
56%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
71%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.8
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
68
44
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
67
Break points won·Clear edge
35
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About