Vincent Spadea vs Thomas JohanssonScottsdale Round of 32

Scottsdale · ATP · Round of 32
51 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 March 2004
hard
51 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWL
Spadea V.
6-4 6-4
Johansson T.
Spadea V.
662
Johansson T.
44

Vincent Spadea defeated Thomas Johansson 6-4 6-4 in the Scottsdale round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Thomas Johansson came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Vincent Spadea claimed a first win over Thomas Johansson in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Vincent Spadea edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

04
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2008-06-23WimbledonR128grassThomas Johansson6-7(8) 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 6-3
2006-10-30Paris MastersR64hardThomas Johansson7-6(4) 7-6(1)
2005-10-10StockholmR16hardThomas Johansson6-3 6-4
1998-06-22WimbledonR64grassThomas Johansson7-5 6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Spadea V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Johansson T.

Johansson T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Spadea V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
8.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
75
80
Break points won·Slight edge
45
51
Deciding sets·Slight edge
53
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
46
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About