Amelie Mauresmo vs Anastasia Myskina — Fed Cup WG SF: RUS vs FRA Round Robin
Fed Cup WG SF: RUS vs FRA · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 19 November 2003
carpet
Mauresmo A.6-7 6-3 6-4
Myskina A.
Mauresmo A.
63662
Myskina A.
77341
Amelie Mauresmo defeated Anastasia Myskina 6-7 6-3 6-4 in the Fed Cup WG SF: RUS vs FRA round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Amelie Mauresmo came in leading the head-to-head 6–1. Amelie Mauresmo extended the head-to-head to 7–1.
Key context
- Match story: Amelie Mauresmo dropped the opening set before beating Anastasia Myskina 6–7 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
6–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-06-26 | Wimbledon | QF | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-1 3-6 6-3 |
| 2005-06-20 | Wimbledon | QF | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2004-01-12 | Sydney | QF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 7-6(4) |
| 2003-10-27 | Philadelphia | F | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 5-7 6-0 6-2 |
| 2003-09-29 | Moscow | F | hard | Anastasia Myskina | 6-2 6-4 |
| 2002-06-24 | Wimbledon | R32 | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2001-08-27 | US Open | R128 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.5
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.7
3.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
68
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
66
Break points won·Clear edge
75
63
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
58
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
65
58
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About