Jarkko Nieminen vs Feliciano LopezLong Island Round of 32

Long Island · ATP · Round of 32
44 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 18 August 2003
hard
44 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLW
Nieminen J.
6-3 1-1
Lopez F.
Nieminen J.
611
Lopez F.
31

Jarkko Nieminen advanced when Feliciano Lopez retired 6-3 1-1 in the Long Island round of 32. Jarkko Nieminen extended the head-to-head to 6–4.

Head to head

54
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-10-07Shanghai MastersR64hardFeliciano Lopez7-6(2) 4-6 6-3
2013-06-17EastbourneR32grassFeliciano Lopez7-6(3) 7-6(5)
2012-06-25WimbledonR128grassJarkko Nieminen7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4
2012-04-23BarcelonaR16clayFeliciano Lopez6-3 6-1
2009-04-20BarcelonaR64clayFeliciano Lopez6-2 6-1
2009-01-12SydneyR32hardJarkko Nieminen6-2 7-6(9)
2007-08-19New HavenR32hardJarkko Nieminen3-6 6-2 7-6(6)
2007-05-28Roland GarrosR128clayJarkko Nieminen6-2 6-4 7-6(2)
2006-10-09StockholmQFhardJarkko Nieminen6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Nieminen J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Lopez F.

Lopez F.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Nieminen J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
11.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
98
Break points won·Dominant
42
2
Deciding sets·Slight edge
60
65
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About