Kim Clijsters vs Patty SchnyderAntwerp Quarter-final

Antwerp · WTA · Quarter-final
43 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 February 2003
hard
47 yrs · 168 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Clijsters K.
7-5 6-1
Schnyder P.
Clijsters K.
762
Schnyder P.
51

Kim Clijsters defeated Patty Schnyder 7-5 6-1 in the Antwerp quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. Kim Clijsters extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Kim Clijsters came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

53
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-10-19LuxembourgR16hardPatty Schnyder6-4 3-6 7-6(6)
2009-08-10CincinnatiR32hardKim Clijsters6-2 7-5
2006-07-24StanfordFhardKim Clijsters6-4 6-2
2005-05-02BerlinR16grassPatty Schnyder6-7(4) 6-5 RET
2004-01-19Australian OpenSFhardKim Clijsters6-2 7-6(2)
2003-09-22LeipzigQFcarpetKim Clijsters6-1 6-3
2003-01-06SydneyR16hardKim Clijsters6-1 6-3
2000-06-19s HertogenboschR16grassPatty Schnyder6-4 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Clijsters K.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Schnyder P.

Schnyder P.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Clijsters K.

Serve advantage — Clijsters K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
79
Break points won·Clear edge
82
67
Deciding sets·Even
74
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast