Ivan Ljubicic vs James BlakeDavis Cup WG R1: CRO vs USA Round Robin

Davis Cup WG R1: CRO vs USA · ATP · Round Robin
47 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWLL
3 — 1
Sets
Friday, 7 February 2003
carpet
46 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Ljubicic I.
6-3 6-7 6-4 6-3
Blake J.
Ljubicic I.
665663
Blake J.
377431

Ivan Ljubicic defeated James Blake 6-3 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Davis Cup WG R1: CRO vs USA round robin on carpet. The result followed the form book — Ivan Ljubicic came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Ivan Ljubicic extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Ljubicic closed it out in four sets, 6–3 6–7 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

32
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-06-08Queen's ClubR32grassJames Blake6-2 7-6(4)
2006-09-25BangkokFhardJames Blake6-3 6-1
2006-05-22DusseldorfRRclayIvan Ljubicic5-7 6-3 7-6(4)
2005-10-31Paris MastersR32hardIvan Ljubicic6-3 6-4
2003-05-26Roland GarrosR64clayIvan Ljubicic6-3 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ljubicic I.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Blake J.

Blake J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ljubicic I.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.8
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
64
54
Break points saved·Even
91
88
Break points won·Clear edge
35
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About