Francesca Schiavone vs Flavia PennettaCanberra Quarter-final

Canberra · WTA · Quarter-final
46 yrs · 166 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 January 2003
hard
44 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLLWWW
Schiavone F.
6-3 4-6 6-2
Pennetta F.
Schiavone F.
6462
Pennetta F.
3621

Francesca Schiavone defeated Flavia Pennetta 6-3 4-6 6-2 in the Canberra quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Francesca Schiavone came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's round of 32. Francesca Schiavone extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-07-29CarlsbadR32hardFrancesca Schiavone7-6(4) 6-7(6) 6-4
2013-03-04Indian WellsR128hardFrancesca Schiavone7-5 6-1
2010-01-04AucklandSFhardFlavia Pennetta6-3 6-0
2009-07-06BastadR32clayFlavia Pennetta6-2 7-5
2008-03-10Indian WellsR32hardFrancesca Schiavone6-3 6-4
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR32clayFrancesca Schiavone4-6 6-1 9-7
2005-09-12BaliQFhardFrancesca Schiavone5-7 6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Schiavone F.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pennetta F.

Pennetta F.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Schiavone F.

Serve advantage — Pennetta F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
55%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
83
Break points won·Clear edge
72
89
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About