Jill Craybas vs Tamarine TanasugarnJapan Open Semi-final

Japan Open · WTA · Semi-final
52 yrs · 160 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 September 2002
hard
49 yrs · 165 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLW
Craybas J.
6-4 4-6 6-4
Tanasugarn T.
Craybas J.
6462
Tanasugarn T.
4641

Jill Craybas defeated Tamarine Tanasugarn 6-4 4-6 6-4 in the Japan Open semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tamarine Tanasugarn came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's final. Jill Craybas narrowed the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Jill Craybas edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

14
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2004-10-04Japan OpenR16hardTamarine Tanasugarn6-3 7-6(2)
2004-09-27GuangzhouR32hardTamarine Tanasugarn6-2 7-5
2004-06-07BirminghamR32grassTamarine Tanasugarn6-1 7-5
2002-06-10BirminghamR32grassJill Craybas2-6 6-4 6-2
2001-10-01Japan OpenR16hardTamarine Tanasugarn6-4 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Craybas J.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Tanasugarn T.

Tanasugarn T.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Craybas J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
58%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
46%
Service points won·Even
52%
54%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
53%
Aces / match·Even
0.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
40
55
Break points won·Slight edge
59
64
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
54
Tiebreaks·
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About