Daniela Hantuchova vs Katarina SrebotnikLeipzig Round of 32

Leipzig · WTA · Round of 32
43 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2002
carpet
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLL
Hantuchova D.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Srebotnik K.
Hantuchova D.
4662
Srebotnik K.
6331

Daniela Hantuchova defeated Katarina Srebotnik 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Leipzig round of 32 on carpet. The result followed the form book — Daniela Hantuchova came in leading the head-to-head 6–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Daniela Hantuchova extended the head-to-head to 7–0.

Key context

Head to head

60
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2008-02-04ParisR16carpetDaniela Hantuchova6-4 1-6 6-3
2007-06-25WimbledonR32grassDaniela Hantuchova2-6 6-3 6-4
2006-06-26WimbledonR32grassDaniela Hantuchova6-4 7-6(2)
2006-05-08BerlinR32grassDaniela Hantuchova6-4 0-6 6-1
2003-07-28San DiegoR32hardDaniela Hantuchova3-6 7-5 7-6(6)
2003-03-05Indian WellsR32hardDaniela Hantuchova7-6(4) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hantuchova D.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Srebotnik K.

Srebotnik K.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hantuchova D.

Serve advantage — Srebotnik K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 180). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
68
74
Break points won·Even
67
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
55
49

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About