Venus Williams vs Meghann Shaughnessy — New Haven Round of 16
New Haven · WTA · Round of 16
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2002
hard
Williams V.6-2 6-4
Shaughnessy M.
Williams V.
662
Shaughnessy M.
24–
Venus Williams defeated Meghann Shaughnessy 6-2 6-4 in the New Haven round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Venus Williams came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending the title. Venus Williams extended the head-to-head to 5–2.
Key context
- Match story: Venus Williams dropped just 6 games past Meghann Shaughnessy.
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-03-19 | Miami | R16 | hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 7-6(2) 6-1 |
| 2002-07-22 | Stanford | R16 | hard | Venus Williams | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2001-07-23 | Stanford | QF | hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 2-6 7-5 7-6(4) |
| 2001-04-30 | Hamburg | F | clay | Venus Williams | 6-3 6-0 |
| 2001-01-15 | Australian Open | R64 | hard | Venus Williams | 6-3 7-6(3) |
| 2000-08-22 | US Open | R32 | hard | Venus Williams | 7-6 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Williams V.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.8
4.2
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
54
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
69
Break points won·Dominant
83
52
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
45
Tiebreaks·
86
—
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Davenport L.
Mauresmo A.
7-676-3
Myskina A.
Hingis M.
6-726-46-0
Hantuchova D.
Schnyder P.
6-46-3
Williams V.
Granville L.
6-26-1
R16
Williams V.
Shaughnessy M.
6-26-4
Hingis M.
Stevenson A.
7-56-4
Myskina A.
Henin J.
7-56-2
Hantuchova D.
Majoli I.
4-66-46-1
Schnyder P.
Sucha M.
2-66-36-3
Granville L.
Roesch A.
7-56-2
Mauresmo A.
Bovina E.
6-44-67-61
Davenport L.
Tulyaganova I.
6-47-63
R32
Schnyder P.
Marrero M.
6-46-1
Myskina A.
Martinez C.
6-16-4
Shaughnessy M.
Tanasugarn T.
4-66-27-5
Granville L.
Bedanova D.
3-66-46-1
Roesch A.
Dementieva E.
6-31-66-3
Majoli I.
Farina Elia S.
6-24-67-62
Hantuchova D.
Hopkins J.
6-36-4
Hingis M.
Smashnova A.
6-46-4
Stevenson A.
Kostanic Tosic J.
6-37-5
Mauresmo A.
Panova T.
6-26-2
Bovina E.
Raymond L.
4-66-16-2
Tulyaganova I.
Sanchez Vicario A.
7-656-3