Tim Henman vs Nicolas Massu — Indianapolis Round of 32

Indianapolis · ATP · Round of 32
GBR
Tim Henman
51 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2002
hard
CHI
Nicolas Massu
46 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Henman T.
6-3 1-6 7-5
Massu N.
Henman T.
6172
Massu N.
3651

Tim Henman defeated Nicolas Massu 6-3 1-6 7-5 in the Indianapolis round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Tim Henman extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Henman closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 7–5.

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2005-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardTim Henman6-2 6-1
2005-05-02Rome MastersR32clayTim Henman6-3 6-2
2004-04-19Monte Carlo MastersR16clayTim Henman3-6 6-4 6-3
2002-04-15Monte Carlo MastersR32clayTim Henman6-1 7-6(3)
2001-01-01AdelaideSFhardNicolas Massu3-6 7-5 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Henman T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Massu N.

Massu N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Henman T.

Serve advantage — Henman T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Henman T.Massu N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Henman T.Massu N.
Clutch Rating·Even
46
47
Break points saved·Even
76
80
Break points won·Slight edge
55
47
Deciding sets·Even
43
46
Tiebreaks·Even
54
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Draw

Final
Rusedski G.
Mantilla F.
6-766-46-4
Semi-finals
Rusedski G.
Haas T.
3-66-36-3
Mantilla F.
Schuettler R.
6-41-66-4
Quarter-finals
Mantilla F.
Clement A.
1-66-46-4
Schuettler R.
Di Pasquale A.
2-66-46-1
Haas T.
Grosjean S.
6-33-66-3
Rusedski G.
Verkerk M.
6-47-66
R16
Verkerk M.
Henman T.
W/O
Mantilla F.
Pavel A.
2-66-46-1
Grosjean S.
Kiefer N.
7-646-3
Haas T.
Kratochvil M.
4-67-56-1
Rusedski G.
Hewitt L.
7-636-4
Di Pasquale A.
Santoro F.
7-656-2
Schuettler R.
Malisse X.
6-36-2
Clement A.
Ancic M.
6-36-4
R32
Di Pasquale A.
Koubek S.
6-27-64
Santoro F.
Arthurs W.
6-46-2
Schuettler R.
Erlich J.
6-15-76-2
Malisse X.
Dent T.
6-46-4
Ancic M.
Kafelnikov Y.
4-66-26-4
Clement A.
Ferreira W.
6-44-67-61
Pavel A.
Clavet F.
6-42-66-3
Mantilla F.
El Aynaoui Y.
7-627-5
Kratochvil M.
Prinosil D.
6-16-4
Grosjean S.
Sargsian S.
3-66-36-3
Haas T.
Norman M.
7-696-3
Hewitt L.
Martin A.
6-37-5
Henman T.
Massu N.
6-31-67-5
Verkerk M.
Popp A.
6-47-5
Rusedski G.
Roux L.
6-36-2
Kiefer N.
Mirnyi M.
6-47-5
R64
Koubek S.
Delgado R.
7-637-61
Schuettler R.
Philippoussis M.
7-627-64
Martin A.
Larsson M.
6-767-56-3
Norman M.
Ginepri R.
7-606-4
Massu N.
Ram R.
6-36-3
Popp A.
Saulnier C.
4-66-26-4
Verkerk M.
Ljubicic I.
6-46-2
Rusedski G.
Montanes A.
7-656-4
Roux L.
Lopez F.
7-55-76-3
Arthurs W.
Lee H.
6-46-3
Santoro F.
Levy H.
6-26-2
Erlich J.
Voinea A.
6-26-3
Dent T.
Weiner G.
6-47-65
Ancic M.
Fukarek O.
4-66-26-2
Ferreira W.
Baker B.
6-46-2
Clement A.
Bjorkman J.
6-47-5
Pavel A.
Morrison J.
4-66-36-2
Clavet F.
Phau B.
6-717-56-1
Mantilla F.
Heuberger I.
7-56-1
Sargsian S.
Llodra M.
6-26-4
Kiefer N.
Pless K.
7-656-2
Mirnyi M.
Mathieu P.
6-27-5
Kratochvil M.
Agaev E.
6-06-2
Prinosil D.
Ulihrach B.
6-36-726-2