Fernando Gonzalez vs Tim Henman — Cincinnati Masters Round of 32
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Round of 32
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2002
hard
Gonzalez F.7-6 6-2
Henman T.
Gonzalez F.
7762
Henman T.
632–
Fernando Gonzalez defeated Tim Henman 7-6 6-2 in the Cincinnati Masters round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's semi-final. Fernando Gonzalez narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.
Key context
- Match story: Fernando Gonzalez closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
1–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-08-04 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-2 RET |
| 2003-07-28 | Washington | F | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2002-05-06 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Fernando Gonzalez | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 |
| 2000-08-28 | US Open | R64 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
65
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
76
Break points won·Slight edge
48
55
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
54
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
33°COvercast
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 41%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Gonzalez F.
Roddick A.
7-647-66
Ferrero J.
Arthurs W.
6-47-62
Moya C.
Schuettler R.
7-636-1
Hewitt L.
Agassi A.
7-56-3
R16
Arthurs W.
Robredo T.
7-634-66-4
Moya C.
Chang M.
6-46-3
Ferrero J.
Dent T.
6-756-17-64
Hewitt L.
Nieminen J.
2-66-26-3
Gonzalez F.
Krajicek R.
6-23-66-3
Schuettler R.
Malisse X.
6-46-3
Roddick A.
Ferreira W.
6-36-2
Agassi A.
Enqvist T.
6-47-5
R32
Hewitt L.
Sanguinetti D.
5-0
Moya C.
Schalken S.
6-26-4
Robredo T.
Rusedski G.
6-23-66-3
Arthurs W.
Sampras P.
4-66-37-64
Dent T.
Rios M.
6-26-3
Ferrero J.
Blake J.
6-44-66-4
Chang M.
Vicente F.
5-77-646-0
Malisse X.
Ljubicic I.
4-67-677-67
Schuettler R.
Gambill J.
6-727-56-3
Ferreira W.
Costa A.
7-666-2
Roddick A.
Kiefer N.
6-46-3
Krajicek R.
Philippoussis M.
7-676-2
Gonzalez F.
Henman T.
7-636-2
Agassi A.
Coria G.
6-06-2
Nieminen J.
Lee H.
6-23-67-5
Enqvist T.
Hrbaty D.
6-36-2
R64
Ferreira W.
Zabaleta M.
7-637-63
Henman T.
Kuerten G.
6-36-4
Dent T.
Johansson T.
6-46-3
Rusedski G.
Safin M.
7-676-2
Robredo T.
Martin T.
4-66-47-61
Arthurs W.
Okun N.
6-37-63
Sampras P.
Canas G.
5-77-666-3
Agassi A.
El Aynaoui Y.
6-44-66-4
Rios M.
Gaudio G.
6-36-2
Sanguinetti D.
Bjorkman J.
3-66-16-2
Hewitt L.
Ginepri R.
6-06-0
Hrbaty D.
Grosjean S.
6-33-66-4
Nieminen J.
Nalbandian D.
3-66-36-4
Blake J.
Pavel A.
6-47-69
Gonzalez F.
Clement A.
6-46-2
Ferrero J.
Delgado R.
7-616-1
Philippoussis M.
Santoro F.
4-67-626-3
Chang M.
Haas T.
6-36-2
Vicente F.
Morrison J.
6-46-1
Schalken S.
Mantilla F.
7-634-66-3
Moya C.
Saulnier C.
6-36-3
Ljubicic I.
Federer R.
2-66-46-3
Malisse X.
Boutter J.
6-747-646-4
Gambill J.
Norman M.
6-46-2
Schuettler R.
Kafelnikov Y.
6-36-2
Krajicek R.
Novak J.
6-46-4
Costa A.
Lapentti N.
4-67-646-4
Roddick A.
Kratochvil M.
6-36-3
Kiefer N.
Mirnyi M.
6-37-66
Enqvist T.
Koubek S.
6-46-0
Lee H.
Ulihrach B.
6-37-5
Coria G.
Chela J.
6-36-4