Gaston Gaudio vs Nikolay DavydenkoAmersfoort Round of 32

Amersfoort · ATP · Round of 32
47 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2002
clay
45 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Gaudio G.
6-1 1-6 6-1
Davydenko N.
Gaudio G.
6162
Davydenko N.
1611

Gaston Gaudio defeated Nikolay Davydenko 6-1 1-6 6-1 in the Amersfoort round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gaston Gaudio came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Gaston Gaudio extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Gaston Gaudio closed it out in three sets, 6–1 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2006-05-29Roland GarrosR16clayNikolay Davydenko6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3
2005-11-14Masters CupRRhardNikolay Davydenko6-3 6-4
2005-07-18StuttgartSFgrassGaston Gaudio6-3 2-1 RET
2004-07-19KitzbuhelR16clayGaston Gaudio6-3 6-3
2004-07-05BastadR32clayGaston Gaudio6-3 6-1
2003-04-04Davis Cup WG QF: ARG vs RUSRRclayGaston Gaudio7-6(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gaudio G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Davydenko N.

Davydenko N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gaudio G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
72
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
91
Break points won·Clear edge
51
74
Deciding sets·Clear edge
58
71
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About