Lleyton Hewitt vs Sebastien GrosjeanMasters Cup Round Robin

Masters Cup · ATP · Round Robin
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 November 2001
hard
48 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLL
Hewitt L.
3-6 6-2 6-3
Grosjean S.
Hewitt L.
3662
Grosjean S.
6231

Lleyton Hewitt defeated Sebastien Grosjean 3-6 6-2 6-3 in the Masters Cup round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's round-robin. Lleyton Hewitt extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

Head to head

53
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2003-06-09Queen's ClubQFgrassSebastien Grosjean6-3 6-4
2001-11-30Davis Cup WG F: AUS vs FRARRgrassLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-2 6-3
2001-11-12Masters CupFhardLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-3 6-4
2001-01-08SydneySFhardLleyton Hewitt6-3 4-6 6-4
2000-07-31Canada MastersR32hardSebastien Grosjean6-3 7-6(5)
2000-01-10SydneyR32hardLleyton Hewitt6-4 6-4
1999-12-03Davis Cup WG F: FRA vs AUSRRclaySebastien Grosjean6-4 6-3
1999-05-03Delray BeachSFhardLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hewitt L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Grosjean S.

Grosjean S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
54%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
63
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
75
Break points won·Even
57
56
Deciding sets·Dominant
71
42
Tiebreaks·Even
58
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About