Lleyton Hewitt vs Guillermo CanasStuttgart Masters Round of 16

Stuttgart Masters · ATP · Round of 16
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 October 2001
carpet
48 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Hewitt L.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Canas G.
Hewitt L.
3662
Canas G.
6141

Lleyton Hewitt defeated Guillermo Canas 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Stuttgart Masters round of 16 on carpet. The result followed the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 5–2, defending last year's final. Lleyton Hewitt extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2007-06-25WimbledonR32grassLleyton Hewitt6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4
2002-05-27Roland GarrosR16clayGuillermo Canas6-7(1) 7-6(13) 6-4 6-3
2001-06-18s HertogenboschFgrassLleyton Hewitt6-3 6-4
2001-05-28Roland GarrosR16clayLleyton Hewitt3-6 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 6-3
1999-06-14NottinghamR16grassLleyton Hewitt6-2 7-5
1999-05-03Delray BeachR32hardLleyton Hewitt6-7(12) 6-2 6-4
1999-04-19OrlandoR16clayGuillermo Canas6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Hewitt L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Canas G.

Canas G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
54%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
63
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
79
Break points won·Even
57
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
71
49
Tiebreaks·Even
58
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About