David Nalbandian vs Tommy RobredoPalermo Semi-final

Palermo · ATP · Semi-final
44 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 September 2001
clay
44 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
Nalbandian D.
6-2 7-6
Robredo T.
Nalbandian D.
6772
Robredo T.
264

David Nalbandian defeated Tommy Robredo 6-2 7-6 in the Palermo semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — David Nalbandian came in leading the head-to-head 5–3. David Nalbandian extended the head-to-head to 6–3.

Key context

Head to head

53
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-02-14Buenos AiresQFclayTommy Robredo6-4 6-4
2010-08-09Canada MastersR32hardDavid Nalbandian6-3 6-0
2010-04-11Monte Carlo MastersR16clayDavid Nalbandian6-3 6-4
2008-04-20Monte Carlo MastersR16clayDavid Nalbandian6-1 6-0
2006-04-17Monte Carlo MastersR16clayTommy Robredo5-7 6-1 7-5
2006-01-16Australian OpenR16hardDavid Nalbandian6-3 6-0 2-6 6-2
2002-07-29Canada MastersR32hardDavid Nalbandian7-6(1) 6-3
2001-07-23SopotSFclayTommy Robredo6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Nalbandian D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Robredo T.

Robredo T.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nalbandian D.

Serve advantage — Nalbandian D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
45
Break points saved·Even
88
87
Break points won·Dominant
69
26
Deciding sets·Even
72
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About