Lleyton Hewitt vs Thomas JohanssonDavis Cup WG SF: AUS vs SWE Round Robin

Davis Cup WG SF: AUS vs SWE · ATP · Round Robin
45 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLLL
3 — 1
Sets
Friday, 21 September 2001
hard
51 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWL
Hewitt L.
7-6 5-7 6-2 6-1
Johansson T.
Hewitt L.
775663
Johansson T.
637211

Lleyton Hewitt defeated Thomas Johansson 7-6 5-7 6-2 6-1 in the Davis Cup WG SF: AUS vs SWE round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Lleyton Hewitt came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Lleyton Hewitt extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Lleyton Hewitt came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 5–7 6–2 6–1.

Head to head

41
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2007-02-26Las VegasRRhardLleyton Hewitt4-6 7-5 6-2
2006-08-07Canada MastersR32hardThomas Johansson6-3 3-2 RET
2005-01-10SydneyQFhardLleyton Hewitt6-1 7-6(4)
2004-03-08Indian Wells MastersR64hardLleyton Hewitt6-2 6-3
2004-02-16RotterdamR16hardLleyton Hewitt7-6(6) 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Hewitt L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Johansson T.

Johansson T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Hewitt L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
54%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
8.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
63
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
80
Break points won·Slight edge
57
51
Deciding sets·Clear edge
71
59
Tiebreaks·Even
58
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About