Marat Safin vs Andy RoddickLos Angeles Round of 32

Los Angeles · ATP · Round of 32
46 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 July 2001
hard
43 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Safin M.
6-3 6-4
Roddick A.
Safin M.
662
Roddick A.
34

Marat Safin defeated Andy Roddick 6-3 6-4 in the Los Angeles round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Andy Roddick came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Marat Safin narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Marat Safin closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

24
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2007-01-15Australian OpenR32hardAndy Roddick7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 7-6(2)
2006-09-22Davis Cup WG SF: RUS vs USARRclayMarat Safin6-4 6-3 7-6(5)
2004-11-15Masters CupRRhardAndy Roddick7-6(7) 7-6(4)
2004-09-27BangkokSFhardAndy Roddick7-6(1) 6-7(0) 7-6(2)
2004-03-08Indian Wells MastersR32hardAndy Roddick7-6(6) 6-2
2004-01-19Australian OpenQFhardMarat Safin2-6 6-3 7-5 6-7(0) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Safin M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Roddick A.

Roddick A.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Safin M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
11.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Clear edge
47
35
Deciding sets·Clear edge
61
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
52
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About