Kim Clijsters vs Meghann ShaughnessyStanford Semi-final

Stanford · WTA · Semi-final
43 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 July 2001
hard
47 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
Clijsters K.
6-3 2-6 6-1
Shaughnessy M.
Clijsters K.
6262
Shaughnessy M.
3611

Kim Clijsters defeated Meghann Shaughnessy 6-3 2-6 6-1 in the Stanford semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Kim Clijsters came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, defending last year's round of 32. Kim Clijsters extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Kim Clijsters closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2009-10-19LuxembourgR32hardKim Clijsters6-2 6-2
2003-08-25US OpenR16hardKim Clijsters6-2 6-4
2003-02-24ScottsdaleSFhardKim Clijsters6-3 7-5
2001-06-25WimbledonR16grassKim Clijsters7-6(2) 7-6(5)
2001-02-26ScottsdaleQFhardMeghann Shaughnessy6-2 6-4
2000-07-24StanfordR32hardMeghann Shaughnessy3-6 7-6(4) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Clijsters K.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Shaughnessy M.

Shaughnessy M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Clijsters K.

Serve advantage — Clijsters K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
48%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
5.2
Double faults / match·Even
4.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
69
Break points won·Dominant
82
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
45
Tiebreaks·
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast