Juan Ignacio Chela vs Nikolay DavydenkoAmsterdam Round of 16

Amsterdam · ATP · Round of 16
46 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 July 2001
clay
45 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLWLW
Chela J.
6-2 6-4
Davydenko N.
Chela J.
662
Davydenko N.
24

Juan Ignacio Chela defeated Nikolay Davydenko 6-2 6-4 in the Amsterdam round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Ignacio Chela came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Juan Ignacio Chela extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

52
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-10-31ValenciaR16hardNikolay Davydenko7-6(0) 6-2
2010-07-26UmagQFclayJuan Ignacio Chela6-2 6-1
2006-12-01Davis Cup WG F: RUS vs ARGRRcarpetNikolay Davydenko6-1 6-2 5-7 6-4
2006-08-14Cincinnati MastersR64hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-4 2-6 6-2
2005-08-22New HavenR32hardJuan Ignacio Chela6-1 7-6(5)
2002-07-22KitzbuhelR16clayJuan Ignacio Chela6-0 6-1
2002-05-06Rome MastersR64clayJuan Ignacio Chela6-1 2-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Chela J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Davydenko N.

Davydenko N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Chela J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
91
Break points won·Clear edge
57
74
Deciding sets·Clear edge
50
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About