Daniela Hantuchova vs Nathalie Dechy — Birmingham Round of 64
Birmingham · WTA · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 June 2001
grass
Hantuchova D.4-6 6-4 6-3
Dechy N.
Hantuchova D.
4662
Dechy N.
6431
Daniela Hantuchova defeated Nathalie Dechy 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Birmingham round of 64 on grass. The result followed the form book — Daniela Hantuchova came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Daniela Hantuchova extended the head-to-head to 4–2.
Key context
- Match story: Daniela Hantuchova dropped the opening set before beating Nathalie Dechy 4–6 6–4 6–3.
Head to head
3–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-05-29 | Roland Garros | R32 | clay | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 3-6 10-8 |
| 2005-09-26 | Luxembourg | QF | hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2003-02-10 | Antwerp | QF | hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) |
| 2002-07-20 | Fed Cup WG QF: SVK vs FRA | RR | carpet | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-5 7-5 |
| 2001-08-27 | US Open | R128 | hard | Nathalie Dechy | 5-7 6-4 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
44%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Even
52%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 132). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
57
42
Break points saved·Even
68
66
Break points won·Even
67
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
57
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
55
46
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Hantuchova D.
Razzano V.
6-46-0
Oremans M.
Brandi K.
6-46-3
Tauziat N.
Kremer A.
6-46-0
Raymond L.
Likhovtseva E.
7-656-4
R16
Razzano V.
Black C.
6-36-747-63
Tauziat N.
Stevenson A.
6-36-3
Kremer A.
Ahl L.
6-36-0
Raymond L.
Myskina A.
1-66-27-65
Likhovtseva E.
Pisnik T.
4-66-46-3
Hantuchova D.
Pratt N.
6-46-4
Brandi K.
Tanasugarn T.
6-27-5
Oremans M.
Molik A.
6-786-27-64
R32
Tanasugarn T.
Woodroffe L.
6-43-0
Pratt N.
Serna M.
6-46-2
Stevenson A.
Sidot A.
6-36-2
Ahl L.
Mcquillan R.
1-67-6117-61
Tauziat N.
Cervanova L.
6-46-1
Kremer A.
Plischke S.
7-56-756-1
Molik A.
Dokic J.
4-66-36-3
Raymond L.
Grande R.
6-36-3
Oremans M.
Dominikovic E.
6-16-4
Hantuchova D.
Daniilidou E.
6-26-3
Myskina A.
Serra Zanetti A.
1-67-656-3
Pisnik T.
Tu M.
6-11-67-64
Likhovtseva E.
Fujiwara R.
6-36-2
Razzano V.
Sugiyama A.
6-26-4
Black C.
Webb V.
6-46-4
Brandi K.
Schiavone F.
6-32-66-2
R64
Plischke S.
Collin H.
7-56-4
Schiavone F.
Irvin M.
7-57-5
Brandi K.
Bovina E.
6-46-3
Oremans M.
Bedanova D.
6-34-67-61
Dominikovic E.
Vavrinec M.
6-32-66-2
Molik A.
Buth D.
6-27-5
Cervanova L.
Sfar S.
4-66-47-62
Stevenson A.
Krasnoroutskaya L.
6-47-5
Woodroffe L.
Bacheva L.
6-25-77-65
Sidot A.
Obata S.
6-36-4
Mcquillan R.
Weingartner M.
6-36-4
Ahl L.
Hopkins J.
2-67-57-64
Webb V.
Vento Kabchi M.
6-37-5
Fujiwara R.
Yoshida Y.
6-32-66-1
Pisnik T.
Pullin J.
6-33-66-2
Tu M.
Drake M.
7-52-66-3
Myskina A.
Osterloh L.
6-34-66-3
Serra Zanetti A.
Boogert K.
6-46-4
Grande R.
Petrova N.
6-46-4
Pratt N.
Talaja S.
6-26-1
Daniilidou E.
Asagoe S.
6-36-3
Hantuchova D.
Dechy N.
4-66-46-3
Black C.
Craybas J.
7-626-3
Razzano V.
Kandarr J.
6-47-65