Tim Henman vs Albert Costa — Rome Masters Round of 64
Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 May 2001
clay
Henman T.6-2 3-6 6-1
Costa A.
Henman T.
6362
Costa A.
2611
Tim Henman defeated Albert Costa 6-2 3-6 6-1 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 6–3, defending last year's round of 32. Tim Henman extended the head-to-head to 7–3.
Key context
- Match story: Tim Henman closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–1.
Head to head
6–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-10-18 | Madrid Masters | R32 | clay | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2002-05-20 | Dusseldorf | RR | clay | Albert Costa | 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
| 2001-07-30 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Albert Costa | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 |
| 2001-04-16 | Monte Carlo Masters | R16 | clay | Tim Henman | 2-6 7-6(6) 6-1 |
| 2001-03-05 | Scottsdale | R32 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2000-11-13 | Paris Masters | R32 | hard | Albert Costa | 6-4 6-4 |
| 2000-10-30 | Stuttgart Masters | R32 | carpet | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2000-03-06 | Scottsdale | SF | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-3 |
| 1998-08-03 | Canada Masters | R16 | hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Henman T.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.4
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
15°CDrizzle
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 89%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Vinciguerra A.
Levy H.
7-676-2
Ferrero J.
Ferreira W.
6-06-2
Kuerten G.
Corretja A.
6-26-3
Lapentti N.
Diaz J.
3-66-16-2
R16
Kuerten G.
Squillari F.
6-16-2
Ferreira W.
Federer R.
7-646-2
Ferrero J.
Boutter J.
6-36-2
Lapentti N.
Mantilla F.
6-32-67-64
Diaz J.
Luzzi F.
6-36-1
Vinciguerra A.
Grosjean S.
6-26-3
Levy H.
Kiefer N.
6-26-4
Corretja A.
Hewitt L.
7-626-4
R32
Ferrero J.
Rios M.
6-16-3
Federer R.
Safin M.
4-66-47-65
Ferreira W.
Rusedski G.
6-46-4
Hewitt L.
Haas T.
7-56-3
Corretja A.
Portas A.
6-746-26-4
Squillari F.
Santoro F.
6-46-0
Kuerten G.
Chang M.
6-16-1
Boutter J.
Henman T.
2-66-36-4
Mantilla F.
Calatrava A.
3-66-37-63
Lapentti N.
Coria G.
3-66-37-5
Luzzi F.
Arazi H.
6-37-64
Diaz J.
Kafelnikov Y.
7-631-67-5
Vinciguerra A.
Santopadre V.
3-67-56-3
Grosjean S.
Bruguera S.
7-53-67-5
Kiefer N.
Enqvist T.
7-644-66-3
Levy H.
Clavet F.
6-47-66
R64
Bruguera S.
Volandri F.
7-627-63
Kafelnikov Y.
Pavel A.
7-53-1
Safin M.
Bjorkman J.
6-23-67-5
Federer R.
Johansson T.
7-634-67-65
Lapentti N.
Gaudio G.
6-36-2
Hewitt L.
Ulihrach B.
6-12-67-5
Arazi H.
Voltchkov V.
6-26-3
Luzzi F.
Clement A.
6-21-66-3
Portas A.
Escude N.
7-656-4
Corretja A.
Moya C.
5-77-56-1
Haas T.
Medvedev A.
7-56-3
Squillari F.
Mirnyi M.
6-17-65
Clavet F.
Schuettler R.
6-16-2
Coria G.
Gambill J.
7-56-4
Santoro F.
Voinea A.
6-36-4
Chang M.
Vicente F.
6-47-5
Kuerten G.
Ljubicic I.
6-747-56-4
Levy H.
Sampras P.
7-52-66-4
Kiefer N.
Pioline C.
6-36-0
Enqvist T.
Pozzi G.
6-26-1
Grosjean S.
Ilie A.
6-46-2
Vinciguerra A.
Meligeni F.
6-26-0
Santopadre V.
Norman M.
6-46-3
Diaz J.
Puerta M.
6-16-2
Ferrero J.
Schalken S.
6-37-5
Mantilla F.
Navarra M.
6-37-65
Calatrava A.
Agassi A.
6-36-3
Rios M.
Sanguinetti D.
4-66-36-4
Boutter J.
Martin T.
6-36-3
Henman T.
Costa A.
6-23-66-1
Ferreira W.
Hrbaty D.
6-26-4
Rusedski G.
Prinosil D.
6-36-2