Tim Henman vs Gustavo Kuerten — Cincinnati Masters Semi-final
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Semi-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2000
hard
Henman T.6-7 6-3 7-6
Kuerten G.
Henman T.
6116772
Kuerten G.
7133601
Tim Henman defeated Gustavo Kuerten 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Cincinnati Masters semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's quarter-final. Tim Henman extended the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Tim Henman dropped the opening set before beating Gustavo Kuerten 6–7 6–3 7–6.
Head to head
4–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-05-02 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2004-07-26 | Canada Masters | R32 | hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 7-5 6-4 |
| 2003-10-27 | Paris Masters | R16 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-4 6-2 |
| 2002-08-05 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2001-08-13 | Indianapolis | QF | hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 3-6 6-1 7-5 |
| 2001-08-06 | Cincinnati Masters | SF | hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 6-2 1-6 7-6(4) |
| 1998-03-16 | Miami Masters | QF | hard | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.4
8.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
27°COvercast
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 72%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Henman T.
Santoro F.
6-16-4
Kuerten G.
Martin T.
6-706-37-65
Enqvist T.
Vicente F.
7-56-1
Clement A.
Squillari F.
6-27-5
R16
Santoro F.
Safin M.
6-17-63
Henman T.
Sampras P.
6-36-4
Vicente F.
Philippoussis M.
3-67-637-64
Squillari F.
Dosedel S.
6-47-5
Clement A.
Kafelnikov Y.
6-46-1
Enqvist T.
Mirnyi M.
6-46-3
Martin T.
Bjorkman J.
6-26-4
Kuerten G.
Koubek S.
1-66-16-2
R32
Vicente F.
Agassi A.
3-66-31-0
Sampras P.
Dent T.
7-637-63
Henman T.
Puerta M.
6-16-2
Clement A.
Damm Sr M.
7-56-3
Philippoussis M.
Rios M.
6-736-47-64
Santoro F.
Grosjean S.
6-26-3
Safin M.
Clavet F.
7-676-3
Kuerten G.
Pozzi G.
7-56-3
Koubek S.
Gaudenzi A.
2-67-56-2
Martin T.
Schalken S.
6-46-4
Enqvist T.
Levy H.
6-46-1
Squillari F.
Novak J.
6-36-4
Mirnyi M.
Arazi H.
6-36-3
Bjorkman J.
Moya C.
4-66-26-1
Dosedel S.
Norman M.
6-746-36-3
Kafelnikov Y.
Woodruff C.
6-47-63
R64
Norman M.
Chela J.
7-637-67
Clavet F.
Federer R.
7-637-64
Gaudenzi A.
Costa A.
6-33-66-1
Sampras P.
Zabaleta M.
6-46-2
Agassi A.
Ferreira W.
7-646-1
Vicente F.
Bryan B.
7-646-3
Rios M.
Rosset M.
6-46-4
Philippoussis M.
Di Pasquale A.
6-46-2
Levy H.
Ilie A.
3-66-36-4
Arazi H.
Lapentti N.
6-46-4
Mirnyi M.
Vinciguerra A.
7-616-4
Enqvist T.
Pavel A.
7-52-67-67
Dosedel S.
Fish M.
7-6116-2
Novak J.
Roux L.
6-16-0
Squillari F.
Gaudio G.
6-747-56-0
Clement A.
Ferrero J.
6-46-2
Damm Sr M.
Spadea V.
7-633-66-2
Woodruff C.
Hrbaty D.
6-13-66-3
Kafelnikov Y.
Krajicek R.
6-31-66-3
Bjorkman J.
Corretja A.
6-46-4
Moya C.
Alami K.
6-36-746-4
Schalken S.
Chang M.
6-44-66-4
Martin T.
Kiefer N.
6-26-2
Koubek S.
Johansson T.
6-26-3
Pozzi G.
Roddick A.
7-656-1
Kuerten G.
Golmard J.
6-06-4
Safin M.
Godwin N.
7-56-3
Grosjean S.
Kucera K.
6-46-4
Santoro F.
Hewitt L.
4-66-46-4
Puerta M.
Voltchkov V.
6-36-1
Henman T.
Mamiit C.
6-35-76-2
Dent T.
Tarango J.
6-43-66-1