Lazaro Navarro Batles vs Rafael Avalos Brenes | Lazaro Navarro Batles Wins 6-4 6-4 6-4

CRC vs CUBRound RobinHardFri 7 AprFinal

SetsGames3

666

444

Lazaro Navarro Batles defeated Rafael Avalos Brenes 6-4 6-4 6-4 in the CRC vs CUB round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Lazaro Navarro Batles came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lazaro Navarro Batles extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Match story: Lazaro Navarro Batles edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4 6–4.

How the match was decided

Auto-generated

Navarro Batles L. took it in straight sets.

Match statistics

Match statistics are not available for this match. They appear once the official scoring feed publishes them.

Common opponents

2 shared · last 12 months

Navarro Batles L. and Avalos Brenes R. faced 2 of the same opponents in the last 12 months. Navarro Batles L. went 2–0 (100%) against them, Avalos Brenes R. 1–1 (50%).

2–0100%Navarro Batles L. · better vs 1Record vs common opponents1–150%Avalos Brenes R. · better vs 0

Vs common opponents · derived from scorelines

6–3Sets3–5

53–47Games38–43

3–1Tiebreaks1–2

1–0Deciding sets1–0

Only 2 common opponents — too few for any conclusion. Shown without assessment.

vs Hernandez A.#470W6-7 7-6 6-2 6-3CUB vs MEX · hardL3-6 2-6 6-7CRC vs MEX · hard
vs Osorio M.W7-6 4-6 7-6 3-6 7-5CUB vs MEX · hardW2-6 6-7 7-6 6-1 6-4CRC vs MEX · hard

Head-to-head

2 meetings · Navarro Batles L. leads 2–0

Hard: Navarro Batles L. leads 1–0 · Clay: Navarro Batles L. leads 1–0

Navarro Batles L.April 2000CRC vs CUBThis matchHard6-4 6-4 6-4
Navarro Batles L.January 2000Central America Masters 4Clay6-3 2-6 6-3

Draw

Closing odds

Player context

Before the match

Navarro Batles L.Avalos Brenes R.1 587ELO1 4791 596Hard ELO1 4844–6Last 103–726Age38RightPlaysRight

Cite this

Lazaro Navarro Batles beat Rafael Avalos Brenes 6-4 6-4 6-4. Umpiry, "Lazaro Navarro Batles vs Rafael Avalos Brenes — CRC vs CUB Round Robin", https://umpiry.com/match/2000-04-07/batles-vs-brenes-crc-vs-cub-rr?utm_source=cite (as of 7 April 2000).