Gaston Gaudio vs Guillermo CanasPalermo Round of 32

Palermo · ATP · Round of 32
47 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 October 1999
clay
48 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Gaudio G.
6-0 6-4
Canas G.
Gaudio G.
662
Canas G.
04

Gaston Gaudio defeated Guillermo Canas 6-0 6-4 in the Palermo round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Guillermo Canas came in leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's round of 32. Gaston Gaudio narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.

Key context

Head to head

34
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2004-07-12StuttgartFgrassGuillermo Canas5-7 6-2 6-0 1-6 6-3
2004-05-24Roland GarrosR128clayGaston Gaudio6-2 2-6 4-6 6-3 6-2
2004-03-01AcapulcoR16hardGuillermo Canas6-4 6-3
2002-03-11Indian Wells MastersR64hardGaston Gaudio6-4 6-2
2001-06-25WimbledonR128grassGuillermo Canas1-6 6-1 3-6 6-2 7-5
2001-02-26AcapulcoQFhardGuillermo Canas6-4 6-4
2000-04-10EstorilR32clayGaston Gaudio6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gaudio G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Canas G.

Canas G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gaudio G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
5.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
49
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
79
Break points won·Slight edge
51
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
58
49
Tiebreaks·Even
54
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About