Martina Hingis vs Chanda Rubin — Canadian Open Round of 16
Canadian Open · WTA · Round of 16
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 August 1999
hard
Hingis M.6-3 6-1
Rubin C.
Hingis M.
662
Rubin C.
31–
Martina Hingis defeated Chanda Rubin 6-3 6-1 in the Canadian Open round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martina Hingis came in leading the head-to-head 7–1, defending last year's semi-final. Martina Hingis extended the head-to-head to 8–1.
Key context
- Match story: Martina Hingis dropped just 4 games past Chanda Rubin.
Head to head
7–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-08-07 | Los Angeles | R16 | hard | Martina Hingis | 5-7 7-5 6-1 |
| 2000-05-29 | Roland Garros | QF | clay | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-3 |
| 2000-02-28 | Scottsdale | R16 | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2000-01-31 | Tokyo | SF | hard | Martina Hingis | 7-6(2) 6-4 |
| 1999-11-08 | Philadelphia | R16 | carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-0 |
| 1999-08-02 | San Diego | R16 | hard | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-3 |
| 1999-03-05 | Indian Wells | QF | hard | Chanda Rubin | 6-3 7-6 |
| 1998-03-19 | Key Biscayne | R64 | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
50%
Aces / match·Even
1.6
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Seles M.
Schett B.
6-33-66-1
Sidot A.
Coetzer A.
5-76-46-4
Pierce M.
Testud S.
6-16-3
Hingis M.
Sanchez Vicario A.
6-16-1
R16
Seles M.
Likhovtseva E.
7-66-3
Testud S.
Talaja S.
6-47-6
Pierce M.
Huber A.
6-27-5
Sanchez Vicario A.
Martinez C.
7-66-1
Hingis M.
Rubin C.
6-36-1
Sidot A.
Sugiyama A.
6-46-3
Coetzer A.
Lucic M.
4-67-66-2
Schett B.
Capriati J.
6-36-2
R32
Testud S.
Serna M.
6-43-66-3
Huber A.
Leon Garcia G.
6-36-1
Pierce M.
Dragomir Ilie R.
7-66-3
Sanchez Vicario A.
Habsudova K.
7-56-2
Martinez C.
Dokic J.
5-76-16-4
Rubin C.
Dechy N.
6-24-66-4
Hingis M.
Morariu C.
6-06-3
Seles M.
Panova T.
6-76-16-1
Likhovtseva E.
Drake M.
6-07-5
Schett B.
Kolbovic R.
6-36-1
Capriati J.
Tauziat N.
1-66-46-2
Sugiyama A.
Novotna J.
5-76-26-1
Sidot A.
Nagyova H.
6-46-2
Lucic M.
Pratt N.
4-66-26-3
Coetzer A.
Kruger J.
6-16-2
Talaja S.
Cocheteux A.
6-46-1
R64
Testud S.
De Swardt M.
6-4
Habsudova K.
Plischke S.
6-46-1
Rubin C.
Pitkowski Malcor S.
6-26-3
Dechy N.
Nejedly M.
1-66-16-0
Morariu C.
Farina Elia S.
7-56-4
Martinez C.
Sanchez Lorenzo M.
6-36-1
Dokic J.
Majoli I.
6-36-4
Dragomir Ilie R.
Grzybowska M.
6-47-5
Leon Garcia G.
Vento Kabchi M.
6-36-0
Huber A.
Spirlea I.
6-26-1
Serna M.
Loit E.
6-36-0
Talaja S.
Tatarkova E.
4-66-46-1
Kruger J.
Torrens Valero C.
7-66-1
Pratt N.
Brandi K.
7-62-67-6
Lucic M.
Schnyder P.
6-36-76-3
Sidot A.
Frazier A.
6-33-67-5
Nagyova H.
Black C.
6-46-1
Sugiyama A.
Jeyaseelan S.
7-56-2
Capriati J.
Montolio A.
6-16-3
Kolbovic R.
Weingartner M.
6-26-1
Schett B.
Stevenson A.
6-27-5
Likhovtseva E.
Smashnova A.
3-66-26-1
Drake M.
Kremer A.
6-26-3
Panova T.
Zuluaga F.
6-46-3