Nicolas Kiefer vs Thomas Enqvist — Rome Masters Round of 64
Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 May 1999
clay
Kiefer N.7-5 6-4
Enqvist T.
Kiefer N.
762
Enqvist T.
54–
Nicolas Kiefer defeated Thomas Enqvist 7-5 6-4 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Kiefer came in leading the head-to-head 6–4. Nicolas Kiefer extended the head-to-head to 7–4.
Key context
- Match story: Nicolas Kiefer edged Thomas Enqvist in two tight sets (7–5 6–4).
Head to head
6–4| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-02-16 | Memphis | SF | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2003-09-22 | Shanghai | R32 | carpet | Nicolas Kiefer | 1-6 6-3 6-3 |
| 2001-08-06 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-4 6-0 |
| 2001-07-30 | Canada Masters | R64 | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-2 7-5 |
| 2001-05-21 | Dusseldorf | RR | clay | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2001-05-07 | Rome Masters | R32 | clay | Nicolas Kiefer | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 |
| 1999-11-22 | Tour Finals | RR | hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-4 7-5 |
| 1999-04-12 | Tokyo | QF | hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 |
| 1998-07-17 | Davis Cup WG QF: GER vs SWE | RR | hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-3 6-3 7-5 |
| 1997-03-03 | Rotterdam | R16 | hard | Thomas Enqvist | 6-2 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
53%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
7.5
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.4
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 67%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Mantilla F.
Prinosil D.
6-26-4
Rafter P.
Lapentti N.
4-67-56-1
Corretja A.
Squillari F.
5-77-647-5
Kuerten G.
Kucera K.
3-66-47-5
R16
Mantilla F.
Meligeni F.
6-26-3
Prinosil D.
Gaudenzi A.
7-56-3
Rafter P.
Agassi A.
6-17-64
Lapentti N.
Kiefer N.
3-67-636-3
Squillari F.
Moya C.
6-37-5
Corretja A.
Santoro F.
7-611-66-1
Kucera K.
Henman T.
4-67-656-3
Kuerten G.
Kafelnikov Y.
7-56-1
R32
Agassi A.
Berasategui A.
6-16-2
Lapentti N.
Rusedski G.
6-36-3
Kiefer N.
Krajicek R.
6-36-2
Santoro F.
Ferreira W.
4-66-36-3
Corretja A.
Arazi H.
6-36-3
Squillari F.
Sanguinetti D.
6-747-646-3
Henman T.
Siemerink J.
7-57-5
Kucera K.
Chang M.
7-56-3
Kuerten G.
Clavet F.
6-36-3
Kafelnikov Y.
Safin M.
6-16-2
Moya C.
Clement A.
6-26-1
Meligeni F.
Sampras P.
6-36-1
Mantilla F.
Hrbaty D.
6-24-67-5
Gaudenzi A.
Spadea V.
1-66-26-3
Prinosil D.
Stoltenberg J.
6-36-0
Rafter P.
Gaudio G.
6-26-3
R64
Rusedski G.
Draper S.
7-647-63
Clement A.
Rosset M.
6-01-0
Santoro F.
Grosjean S.
7-627-63
Mantilla F.
Zabaleta M.
6-1
Stoltenberg J.
Bjorkman J.
4-66-46-4
Berasategui A.
Van Lottum J.
4-66-47-5
Agassi A.
Golmard J.
6-36-4
Lapentti N.
Portas A.
6-756-46-2
Kiefer N.
Enqvist T.
7-56-4
Krajicek R.
Gambill J.
6-03-66-1
Moya C.
Furlan R.
6-26-4
Sanguinetti D.
Santopadre V.
1-66-26-3
Squillari F.
Meneschincheri M.
6-06-3
Ferreira W.
Costa A.
3-66-27-64
Arazi H.
Fromberg R.
1-66-16-4
Corretja A.
Nargiso D.
6-17-62
Henman T.
Vacek D.
7-56-3
Siemerink J.
Ilie A.
6-37-5
Chang M.
Muster T.
7-656-746-4
Kucera K.
Delgado R.
6-36-2
Kuerten G.
Vicente F.
6-46-3
Clavet F.
El Aynaoui Y.
6-32-66-4
Safin M.
Voinea A.
6-26-1
Meligeni F.
Pioline C.
6-16-2
Hrbaty D.
Pozzi G.
6-06-1
Spadea V.
Philippoussis M.
7-624-66-1
Gaudenzi A.
Johansson T.
6-14-67-5
Prinosil D.
Rios M.
6-25-76-3
Rafter P.
Ivanisevic G.
7-56-0
Gaudio G.
Puerta M.
6-16-4
Sampras P.
Ulihrach B.
3-66-27-62
Kafelnikov Y.
Woodruff C.
7-615-76-4