Mary Pierce vs Amelie Mauresmo — Rome Semi-final
Rome · WTA · Semi-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 May 1999
clay
Pierce M.6-7 6-2 6-4
Mauresmo A.
Pierce M.
6662
Mauresmo A.
7241
Mary Pierce defeated Amelie Mauresmo 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Rome semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Amelie Mauresmo came in leading the head-to-head 6–3. Mary Pierce narrowed the head-to-head to 6–4.
Key context
- Match story: Mary Pierce dropped the opening set before beating Amelie Mauresmo 6–7 6–2 6–4.
Head to head
3–6| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-02-06 | Paris | F | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-1 7-6(2) |
| 2005-11-07 | WTA Tour Championships | F | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 |
| 2005-11-07 | WTA Tour Championships | RR | carpet | Mary Pierce | 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
| 2005-08-29 | US Open | QF | hard | Mary Pierce | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2005-02-14 | Antwerp | R16 | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-1 |
| 2005-02-07 | Paris | R16 | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2000-05-15 | Rome | R16 | clay | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-3 6-4 |
| 2000-01-07 | Sydney | QF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-3 |
| 1999-10-25 | Linz | SF | hard | Mary Pierce | 7-5 6-3 |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
45%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
46%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
25°COvercast
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 51%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Williams V.
Monami D.
7-66-2
Hingis M.
Williams S.
6-26-2
Mauresmo A.
Plischke S.
6-26-3
Pierce M.
Testud S.
6-47-5
R16
Mauresmo A.
Schnyder P.
5-76-26-4
Plischke S.
Sanchez Vicario A.
6-46-1
Hingis M.
Morariu C.
6-16-4
Williams S.
Spirlea I.
6-26-3
Williams V.
Kournikova A.
6-26-2
Monami D.
Tauziat N.
6-47-6
Testud S.
Smashnova A.
7-56-1
Pierce M.
Martinez C.
4-66-07-6
R32
Schnyder P.
Serra Zanetti A.
6-27-5
Sanchez Vicario A.
Brandi K.
6-06-2
Plischke S.
Coetzer A.
6-42-66-1
Mauresmo A.
Dementieva E.
1-66-37-5
Pierce M.
Peschke K.
6-36-4
Martinez C.
Pitkowski Malcor S.
6-36-3
Smashnova A.
Snyder T.
6-37-5
Testud S.
Sidot A.
6-16-1
Tauziat N.
Garbin T.
6-46-2
Monami D.
Appelmans S.
6-46-76-3
Kournikova A.
Serna M.
6-46-3
Williams V.
Leon Garcia G.
7-54-66-4
Williams S.
Panova T.
6-26-1
Spirlea I.
Papadaki C.
6-46-0
Morariu C.
Dragomir Ilie R.
6-26-3
Hingis M.
Dechy N.
6-16-1
R64
Kournikova A.
Grande R.
6-76-32-0
Dragomir Ilie R.
Schiavone F.
6-46-3
Brandi K.
Cacic S.
6-46-2
Morariu C.
Likhovtseva E.
6-26-1
Spirlea I.
Black C.
6-36-0
Papadaki C.
Tatarkova E.
7-66-3
Panova T.
Dechaume Balleret A.
6-07-5
Leon Garcia G.
Habsudova K.
6-46-3
Serna M.
Vento Kabchi M.
6-36-3
Monami D.
Arendt N.
6-16-0
Peschke K.
Fusai A.
6-26-4
Appelmans S.
Sugiyama A.
7-56-4
Garbin T.
Weingartner M.
6-16-4
Serra Zanetti A.
De Swardt M.
7-57-5
Dementieva E.
Serra Zanetti A.
7-57-5
Snyder T.
Ruano Pascual V.
6-24-66-3
Smashnova A.
Zvereva N.
6-36-1
Martinez C.
Farina Elia S.
6-46-1
Pitkowski Malcor S.
Sanchez Lorenzo M.
6-46-3
Plischke S.
Lubiani F.
6-26-3
Mauresmo A.
Drake M.
6-26-1
Coetzer A.
Di Natale G.
6-36-0
Sidot A.
Kremer A.
6-23-66-1
Dechy N.
Oremans M.
6-26-2