Martina Hingis vs Amelie Mauresmo — SUI vs FRA Round Robin
SUI vs FRA · WTA · Round Robin
2 — 1
Sets
Saturday, 25 July 1998 ·
clay
Hingis M.6-7 6-4 6-2
Mauresmo A.
Hingis M.
6662
Mauresmo A.
7421
Martina Hingis defeated Amelie Mauresmo 6-7 6-4 6-2 in the SUI vs FRA round robin on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Amelie Mauresmo came in leading the head-to-head 7–6. Martina Hingis narrowed the head-to-head to 7–7.
Key context
- Match story: Martina Hingis dropped the opening set before beating Amelie Mauresmo 6–7 6–4 6–2.
Head to head
6–7| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-11-06 | WTA Tour Championships | RR | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
| 2006-05-08 | Berlin | QF | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2006-02-27 | Doha | SF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-2 6-2 |
| 2001-05-14 | Rome | SF | clay | Amelie Mauresmo | 6-4 7-6 |
| 2001-05-07 | Berlin | SF | grass | Amelie Mauresmo | 2-6 6-0 6-4 |
| 2001-04-16 | Charleston | QF | clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-2 |
| 2000-10-21 | Moscow | SF | hard | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-3 |
| 2000-01-07 | Sydney | SF | hard | Amelie Mauresmo | 7-5 6-3 |
| 1999-09-27 | Grand Slam Cup | QF | hard | Martina Hingis | 7-6 6-2 |
| 1999-05-24 | Roland Garros | R64 | clay | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-3 |
| 1999-02-22 | Paris | QF | carpet | Amelie Mauresmo | 2-6 6-1 6-3 |
| 1999-01-18 | Australian Open | F | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-3 |
| 1998-08-31 | US Open | R32 | hard | Martina Hingis | 4-6 6-2 6-2 |
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
46%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
57
75
Break points saved·Even
64
66
Break points won·Slight edge
76
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
46
82
Tiebreaks·
—
65
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About