Martina Hingis vs Mirjana Lucic — Rome Semi-final

Rome · WTA · Semi-final
SUI
Martina Hingis
45 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 4 May 1998
clay
CRO
Mirjana Lucic
44 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLWL
Hingis M.
6-2 6-1
Lucic M.
Hingis M.
662
Lucic M.
21–

Martina Hingis defeated Mirjana Lucic 6-2 6-1 in the Rome semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Martina Hingis came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Martina Hingis extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2000-01-17Australian OpenR128hardMartina Hingis6-1 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Hingis M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Lucic M.

Lucic M.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Hingis M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hingis M.Lucic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Even
58%
56%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
6.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hingis M.Lucic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
28
Break points saved·Dominant
74
45
Break points won·Slight edge
68
79
Deciding sets·Even
46
43
Tiebreaks·
—
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
17°COvercast
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 77%

Draw

Final
Hingis M.
Williams V.
6-32-66-3
Semi-finals
Hingis M.
Lucic M.
6-26-1
Williams V.
Sanchez Vicario A.
6-32-67-5
Quarter-finals
Lucic M.
Testud S.
7-5
Hingis M.
Kournikova A.
6-26-4
Williams V.
Williams S.
6-46-2
Sanchez Vicario A.
Raymond L.
6-76-16-2
R16
Williams V.
Fusai A.
6-16-1
Kournikova A.
Majoli I.
6-33-66-2
Lucic M.
Pierce M.
7-56-4
Testud S.
Seles M.
6-24-67-5
Williams S.
Martinez C.
6-26-2
Raymond L.
Dragomir Ilie R.
6-46-1
Hingis M.
Spirlea I.
6-16-2
Sanchez Vicario A.
Monami D.
6-16-2
R32
Williams S.
Kruger J.
5-1
Martinez C.
Perfetti F.
6-14-66-3
Majoli I.
Kandarr J.
4-66-46-4
Fusai A.
Novotna J.
2-67-66-3
Williams V.
Sanchez Lorenzo M.
6-16-4
Dragomir Ilie R.
Coetzer A.
6-26-2
Raymond L.
Miller A.
6-23-67-6
Monami D.
Sawamatsu N.
6-46-4
Sanchez Vicario A.
Torrens Valero C.
6-37-5
Seles M.
Farina Elia S.
6-26-1
Testud S.
Schett B.
4-66-26-3
Lucic M.
Likhovtseva E.
3-66-26-2
Pierce M.
Pitkowski Malcor S.
6-16-2
Kournikova A.
Paulus B.
6-26-2
Spirlea I.
Ruano Pascual V.
6-37-6
Hingis M.
Li F.
6-36-0
R64
Spirlea I.
Halard Decugis J.
6-46-2
Likhovtseva E.
Schnyder P.
4-66-46-4
Lucic M.
Cacic S.
6-16-77-6
Kandarr J.
Labat F.
4-66-47-6
Pitkowski Malcor S.
Appelmans S.
6-13-66-3
Ruano Pascual V.
Leon Garcia G.
7-56-3
Li F.
Barabanschikova O.
7-66-2
Fusai A.
Sugiyama A.
7-66-0
Sanchez Lorenzo M.
Oremans M.
6-46-1
Paulus B.
Vento Kabchi M.
6-26-3
Kournikova A.
Csurgo V.
6-06-1
Testud S.
Golarsa L.
2-66-46-2
Schett B.
Grzybowska M.
4-66-36-2
Farina Elia S.
Lubiani F.
6-06-1
Torrens Valero C.
Schultz Mccarthy B.
4-66-26-3
Sawamatsu N.
Courtois L.
1-66-26-4
Monami D.
Habsudova K.
6-46-2
Raymond L.
Sidot A.
2-66-37-5
Miller A.
Grande R.
6-36-0
Dragomir Ilie R.
Capriati J.
6-36-2
Perfetti F.
Gagliardi E.
7-56-2
Kruger J.
Garbin T.
6-76-46-1
Williams S.
Tauziat N.
7-56-0
Williams V.
Basuki Y.
6-26-3