Jonas Bjorkman vs Tim HenmanStuttgart Masters Round of 16

Stuttgart Masters · ATP · Round of 16
54 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 October 1997
carpet
51 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLWLWL
Bjorkman J.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Henman T.
Bjorkman J.
6362
Henman T.
2631

Jonas Bjorkman defeated Tim Henman 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Stuttgart Masters round of 16 on carpet. The upset overturned the form book — Tim Henman came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Jonas Bjorkman narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Jonas Bjorkman closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

34
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2006-08-07Canada MastersR64hardTim Henman6-2 6-3
2003-10-06ViennaQFhardTim Henman6-1 6-4
2002-02-08Davis Cup WG R1: GBR vs SWERRcarpetTim Henman6-4 7-5 4-6 7-5
2002-01-14Australian OpenR16hardJonas Bjorkman6-2 7-6(6) 6-4
2000-06-19NottinghamR32grassJonas Bjorkman5-7 6-4 7-5
1999-02-08DubaiR16hardTim Henman6-3 7-6(7)
1998-09-28Grand Slam CupR16carpetJonas Bjorkman7-5 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Bjorkman J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Henman T.

Henman T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bjorkman J.

Serve advantage — Henman T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.8
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
44
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
67
76
Break points won·Slight edge
50
55
Deciding sets·Slight edge
51
43
Tiebreaks·Even
55
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About