Conchita Martinez vs Lindsay Davenport — Canadian Open Quarter-final
Canadian Open · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 11 August 1997
hard
Martinez C.6-4 4-6 6-2
Davenport L.
Martinez C.
6462
Davenport L.
4621
Conchita Martinez defeated Lindsay Davenport 6-4 4-6 6-2 in the Canadian Open quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lindsay Davenport came in leading the head-to-head 8–2. Conchita Martinez narrowed the head-to-head to 8–3.
Key context
- Match story: Conchita Martinez closed it out in three sets, 6–4 4–6 6–2.
Head to head
2–8| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-02-28 | Dubai | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-4 |
| 2005-01-17 | Australian Open | R128 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-0 |
| 2004-07-26 | San Diego | R16 | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2003-05-26 | Roland Garros | R16 | clay | Conchita Martinez | 6-4 2-0 RET |
| 2000-11-24 | Fed Cup WG F: USA vs ESP | RR | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 6-2 |
| 2000-11-04 | Philadelphia | SF | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-0 6-1 |
| 2000-03-10 | Indian Wells | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-1 |
| 1999-08-09 | Manhattan Beach | QF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-7 6-3 6-2 |
| 1998-01-19 | Australian Open | SF | hard | Conchita Martinez | 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
| 1997-11-10 | Philadelphia | R16 | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Davenport L.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
62%
Return points won·Even
47%
48%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.9
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Martinez C.
Davenport L.
6-44-66-2
Huber A.
Coetzer A.
2-66-16-4
Fernandez M.
Maleeva M.
6-26-76-4
Seles M.
Grande R.
6-06-0
R16
Huber A.
Testud S.
6-36-4
Martinez C.
Basuki Y.
6-16-4
Seles M.
Appelmans S.
6-37-5
Grande R.
Pierce M.
6-26-2
Davenport L.
Serna M.
7-56-4
Coetzer A.
Po Messerli K.
6-36-3
Fernandez M.
Sanchez Vicario A.
6-46-3
Maleeva M.
Sawamatsu N.
7-56-4
R32
Maleeva M.
Lubiani F.
6-76-46-4
Seles M.
Carlsson A.
6-26-4
Appelmans S.
Fusai A.
6-36-3
Grande R.
Tanasugarn T.
6-42-66-2
Pierce M.
Jeyaseelan S.
6-16-1
Davenport L.
Sugiyama A.
6-27-6
Serna M.
Saeki M.
7-64-66-3
Basuki Y.
Kijimuta N.
6-46-2
Martinez C.
Yoshida Y.
6-33-66-1
Huber A.
Labat F.
6-26-1
Testud S.
Raymond L.
6-36-3
Po Messerli K.
Capriati J.
6-36-2
Coetzer A.
Dechy N.
4-66-46-2
Sanchez Vicario A.
Miller A.
6-26-1
Fernandez M.
Arendt N.
6-46-2
Sawamatsu N.
Majoli I.
7-56-76-1
R64
Labat F.
Wild L.
6-26-0
Serna M.
Kolbovic R.
6-26-2
Carlsson A.
Grossman A.
6-46-3
Saeki M.
Spirlea I.
4-66-36-2
Kijimuta N.
Schultz Mccarthy B.
6-42-66-3
Po Messerli K.
Tauziat N.
6-17-6
Capriati J.
Farina Elia S.
6-46-3
Dechy N.
Williams V.
6-11-66-1
Miller A.
Likhovtseva E.
7-62-66-3
Grande R.
Rittner B.
6-23-66-3
Arendt N.
Sukova H.
6-26-4
Fusai A.
Pitkowski Malcor S.
6-16-0
Appelmans S.
Hy Boulais P.
6-36-3
Tanasugarn T.
Dragomir Ilie R.
6-06-1
Basuki Y.
Kleinova S.
6-36-0
Fernandez M.
Kruger J.
6-47-5
Maleeva M.
Habsudova K.
6-36-3
Lubiani F.
Panova T.
6-27-6
Sawamatsu N.
Rubin C.
6-16-4
Jeyaseelan S.
Babel M.
6-47-6
Sugiyama A.
Callens E.
6-46-3
Yoshida Y.
Ellwood A.
5-76-36-1
Testud S.
Sanchez Lorenzo M.
7-56-2
Raymond L.
Glass A.
6-26-1