Conchita Martinez vs Monica Seles — Stanford Quarter-final
Stanford · WTA · Quarter-final
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 July 1997
hard
Martinez C.7-6 6-4
Seles M.
Martinez C.
762
Seles M.
64–
Conchita Martinez defeated Monica Seles 7-6 6-4 in the Stanford quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Monica Seles came in leading the head-to-head 9–0. Conchita Martinez claimed a first win over Monica Seles in ten meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 9–1.
Key context
- Match story: Conchita Martinez edged Monica Seles in two tight sets (7–6 6–4).
Head to head
0–9| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-18 | Miami | R64 | hard | Monica Seles | 5-7 6-4 6-3 |
| 2000-04-10 | Amelia Island | F | clay | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-2 |
| 1999-09-20 | Tokyo | QF | hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-0 |
| 1999-05-24 | Roland Garros | QF | clay | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-4 |
| 1999-04-05 | Amelia Island | SF | clay | Monica Seles | 6-0 6-1 |
| 1999-03-18 | Key Biscayne | R32 | hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 6-1 |
| 1998-07-25 | Fed Cup WG1 SF: ESP vs USA | RR | clay | Monica Seles | 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
| 1997-08-11 | Canadian Open | SF | hard | Monica Seles | 6-2 7-6 |
| 1997-03-31 | Hilton Head | SF | clay | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-4 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
50%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
46%
26%
Service points won·Clear edge
55%
39%
Return points won·Even
47%
43%
Break points saved·Clear edge
57%
40%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
12.0
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Martinez C.
Seles M.
7-66-4
Coetzer A.
Po Messerli K.
7-56-4
Davenport L.
Likhovtseva E.
7-66-3
Hingis M.
Wild L.
6-16-76-3
R16
Seles M.
Grande R.
6-26-1
Likhovtseva E.
Raymond L.
6-46-3
Hingis M.
Maleeva M.
6-16-2
Wild L.
Kremer A.
6-36-4
Po Messerli K.
Sugiyama A.
6-36-1
Davenport L.
Cacic S.
6-26-2
Coetzer A.
Tu M.
6-26-0
Martinez C.
Frazier A.
6-16-1
R32
Wild L.
Mcneil L.
6-47-5
Sugiyama A.
Miller A.
6-22-66-3
Tu M.
De Lone E.
7-55-76-0
Martinez C.
Drake Brockman S.
6-36-2
Frazier A.
Kijimuta N.
4-66-06-0
Grande R.
Barabanschikova O.
6-47-6
Maleeva M.
Nejedly J.
6-06-3
Kremer A.
Pierce M.
3-66-16-4
Cacic S.
Grossman A.
6-26-2
Likhovtseva E.
Hy Boulais P.
6-36-2
Raymond L.
Lubiani F.
6-46-3
Po Messerli K.
Schnitzer M.
6-26-4