Martina Hingis defeated Lindsay Davenport 6-3 1-6 6-2 in the Stanford semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lindsay Davenport came in leading the head-to-head 12–8. Martina Hingis narrowed the head-to-head to 12–9.
| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-03-06 | Indian Wells | R16 | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 1-6 6-2 |
| 2001-10-08 | Filderstadt | SF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 2-1 RET |
| 2001-01-29 | Tokyo | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 |
| 2001-01-07 | Sydney | F | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
| 2000-11-04 | Philadelphia | F | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 7-6(7) 6-4 |
| 2000-10-09 | Zurich | F | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 4-6 7-5 |
| 2000-03-20 | Miami | F | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2000-03-10 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 4-6 6-4 6-0 |
| 2000-01-17 | Australian Open | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-1 7-5 |
| 1999-11-15 | WTA Tour Championships | F | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-2 |
| 1999-11-08 | Philadelphia | F | carpet | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-4 |
| 1999-01-11 | Sydney | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-3 |
| 1998-11-16 | WTA Tour Championships | F | carpet | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
| 1998-08-31 | US Open | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 7-5 |
| 1998-08-10 | Manhattan Beach | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
| 1998-03-05 | Indian Wells | F | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-4 |
| 1998-02-03 | Tokyo | F | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-3 6-3 |
| 1997-11-10 | Philadelphia | F | carpet | Martina Hingis | 7-5 6-7 7-6 |
| 1997-08-25 | US Open | SF | hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-4 |
| 1997-08-04 | Manhattan Beach | SF | hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 4-6 6-4 |
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About