Conchita Martinez vs Kim Clijsters: Head-to-Head Record
Hard: 1–3Clay: 0–1Grass: 0–1
Weighted by importance & recency
0.5–5.5
The same matches re-weighted by what was at stake and how recently — a Grand Slam final this year counts for more than an early round a decade ago.
1–5
Kim Clijsters
Conchita Martinez and Kim Clijsters have met 6 times on the professional tour. Kim Clijsters leads the head-to-head 5–1. Their most recent meeting came at Eastbourne in 2005.
Conchita Martinez vs Kim Clijsters stats comparison
Form
WLLWLWLWLWLast 10LLLLLWLWWL
02026 titles0
Serve vs return
Recent formBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Set records · last ~30 matches
First sets won·Even
60%
57%
Deciding sets won·Even
50%
50%
Career
Career win rate·Clear edge
62%
79%
5Career titles41
0Grand Slam titles4
Profile
54Age43
170 cmHeight175 cm
RightPlaysRight
Set records use each player's last ~30 completed matches; form shows the last 10 results. Ratings come from the same data that powers the Umpiry Score.
All 6 meetings
- Eastbourne · Round of 162005 · Kim Clijsters won6-2 6-2
- Indian Wells · Quarter-final2005 · Kim Clijsters won6-1 3-6 6-2
- Roland Garros · Quarter-final2003 · Kim Clijsters won6-2 6-1
- Indian Wells · Semi-final2003 · Kim Clijsters won6-3 6-2
- Filderstadt · Quarter-final2000 · Kim Clijsters won7-5 7-5
- San Diego · Round of 322000 · Conchita Martinez won6-3 6-4
Frequently asked questions
Who leads the head-to-head between Conchita Martinez and Kim Clijsters?
Kim Clijsters leads the head-to-head against Conchita Martinez 5–1 after 6 meetings.
How many times have Conchita Martinez and Kim Clijsters played each other?
Conchita Martinez and Kim Clijsters have played each other 6 times on the professional tour.
When did Conchita Martinez and Kim Clijsters last play each other?
Their most recent meeting came at Eastbourne in 2005, where Kim Clijsters won.